失去基督信仰后普世价值也不可能在西方社会存在，只能成为政治正确这个虚伪的概念。（中英文版）

我们对任何一个讲求普世价值的政治家，唯一要求就是同等付出，你要别人付出，那么自己也要有相当比例的同等付出，不可能别人牺牲生命财产，而你却坐享其成。例如，我们可以要求奥巴马住在芝加哥，而不是搬到华盛顿，当然他可以住在豪华别墅里，拥有戒备森严的保安，你也不可能要求他像一般黑人一样生活，这也不现实，但是他那么爱黑人，那么追求人人平等，不生活在芝加哥又要生活在哪里？或者要求默克尔家里也收养几名难民，她那么喜欢难民，那么追求普世价值，总不能让同胞人饱受难民的骚扰，而自己却像没事一般吧。

判断一个政治家是真正的信仰，还是以普世价值、“政治正确”之名，寻求自己的利益，可以将他提出的主张与圣经内容相对比，因为平等、自由这些普世价值来自圣经，如果一个政治家鼓吹的内容，与圣经差别太大的话，绝对是值得怀疑。例如，当一个政治家将同性恋、变性人权利置于一般人之上时，那么基本可以断定他就是个虚伪的政客，挥舞着道德大棒为自己谋利，因为这些与圣经的内容相差太多。你可以主张尊重同性恋、变性人的权利，但是你将他们的权利至于一般人权利之上，并且到处鼓吹他们的生活方式，那绝对就有问题了。我们不应该对同性恋、变性人持仇恨的态度，但是也不可能去美化他们，让一般人也成为同性恋、变性人，这就与圣经出入太大了，也绝对违背人伦常理。我们一般人由于知识所限，很难分辨什么是信仰？什么是普世价值、“政治正确”？怎么办？不用担心，只要将这些政治家提出的主张与圣经对比，就一目了然了。

这些左派政治家到处鼓吹普世价值，希望建立一个普世价值的新社会，只能说纯属白日梦，只能给人类带来无穷无尽的灾难，因为根本就没有什么普世的价值，所有这些普世价值都是基督教世界所独有的，离开基督教信仰这个条件，这些普世价值、“政治正确”只能是无源之水，很快就会干涸的。

Therefore, universal values without belief turn into “political correctness” ,which can only be used by hypocritical politicians. This is the same reason that after human morality leaves away from belief, it is just synonymous with empty, pale, and can only produce hypocrites like Obama. Of course, you can only criticize hypocritical “political correctness”, and you cannot criticize human morality and universal values. After all, they are truths from the depths of the universe and are untouchable bottom lines. Because when morality is connected with belief, it is sacred and solemn and used to practice, we dare not even talk about it at will. However, when the universal value has nothing to do with belief and becomes a concept, it also becomes a pronoun for false and empty, which can be used to produce profits. Thus, politicians like Obama can wield the moral stick of universal value and “political correctness” to criticize others and achieve superiority. Because of the pursuit of universal value, they become great politicians and leaders of this society, satisfying their boundless vanity and pleasure. This is the real reason why leftist politicians refer to “equality, freedom, Human rights “in all their words. These leftist politicians do not pursue universal values for the sake of faith, so they may not sacrifice anything for these concepts. It is just generosity by costing others wealth. Obama can express his countless love for black brothers in his speech, but at the first opportunity, he leaves Chicago, where black people garner and moves his family to Washington, where rich white people gather. When Merkel was asked whether she could raise several refugees, she firmly answered, “never.”. This is the genuine attitude of leftist politicians toward universal values, which is extremely hypocritical. This is also the fate of equality, freedom, and human rights when they leave the embrace of Christianity, and they become similar to Confucianism in ancient Chinese society. Their role is to produce hypocrites, who are on the moral high horse. The fundamental reason for this phenomenon is that society is becoming more and more secular and far away from Christianity, which is more and more similar to the secular society of atheism.

We can see that leftist politicians such as Obama and Merkel seem generous and practice universal values, but they are all in a haughty manner, which only causes great harm to the country and society. For example, “equality for all” is an alleged universal value, a concept of “political correctness,” and a pleasant thing from heaven left behind in our subconscious. People feel it is mighty and lofty and believes that it is humans’ ultimate aim. Most of us dare not oppose this concept. But why do we feel strange when we think of such mighty and lofty concepts as the ultimate aim of humans? Because these concepts do not stand by belief, they can not be achieved in reality under the present conditions. No religion thinks that all people’s rights are equal. It just is a hypocritical concept inferred by the politician, and even can be said, fantasied by the politician.

Our requirement for any politician who stresses universal value only is to pay equally. If you want others to pay, you must pay a corresponding proportion. It is impossible for other people to sacrifice their property, even lives, and you sit idle and enjoy the benefits. For example, we can ask Obama to live in Chicago instead of moving to Washington. Of course, he can live in a luxury villa with tight security. You can’t ask him to live like an ordinary black man; this is unrealistic. However, how much does he love black people? How eagerly does he pursue equality for all? If he doesn’t live in Chicago? Where does he live? Or we can ask Merkel to adopt some refugees, how much she likes refugees! How ardently she pursues universal values! She can’t let refugees harass her compatriots, but she seems nothing.

To judge whether a politician really believes in universal values and “political correctness” or seeks his own interests in the name of those, we can compare his proposition with the content of the Bible because the universal values come from the Bible. If the proposition advocated by a politician is much different from the Bible, it must be questionable. For example, when a politician puts the rights of homosexuals and transgender above normal people, it can be concluded that he is a hypocritical politician. He waves a moral stick solely for his own benefit because their options are too different from the Bible’s contents. You can claim to respect the rights of homosexuals and transgender, but if you put their rights above normal people and preach their way of life everywhere, there is absolutely a problem. We should not hate homosexuals and transgender, but it is impossible to beautify them and abet becoming them. This is too different from the Bible and absolutely contrary to the common sense of human relations. Because of the limitation of our knowledge, it is difficult for us to distinguish what faith is? What are the universal values, and what is “political correctness of empty and void”? What should I do? Don’t worry; compare these politicians’ ideas with the Bible.

These leftist politicians preach universal values everywhere and hope to build a new society with universal values. It can only be said to be daydreaming and bring endless disasters to humans because there are no universal values in essence. All these universal values are unique to the Christian world. Without the condition of the Christian faith, these universal values, “Political correctness,” can only be water without a source; fish out of the water and will soon dry up and die.

We can see that leftist politicians such as Obama and Merkel seem generous and practice universal values, but they are all in a haughty manner, which only causes great harm to the country and society. For example, “equality for all” is an alleged universal value, a concept of “political correctness,” and a pleasant thing from heaven left behind in our subconscious. People feel it is mighty and lofty and believes that it is humans’ ultimate aim. Most of us dare not oppose this concept. But why do we feel strange when we think of such mighty and lofty concepts as the ultimate aim of humans? Because these concepts do not stand by belief, they can not be achieved in reality under the present conditions. No religion thinks that all people’s rights are equal. It just is a hypocritical concept inferring by the politician, and even can be said, fantasying by the politician.

The purpose of these politicians is to highlight that they are greater than ordinary people. Although “equality for all” seems an incomparable universal value, it can’t win support from most religious believers. After all, religious belief is an essential matter in human society. Therefore, the “equality for all” concept is plausible and can’t be implemented. Without belief, they are just saying. These politicians never want to practice it; they just use it as a moral stick to strike others. And, at present, the unconditional “equality for all” has harmed society. In recent years, the continuous black riots in the United States obviously come from this “equality for all”. Another example is “homosexual rights,” which are also a universal value and “politically correct”. The minority of homosexuals require equal rights, the requirement is from equal rights for all, from the remnant but decent impression coming from human’s subconsciousness and seems proper. However, it is problematic from the perspective of faith because no religion recognizes homosexuality as normal; it’s harder to connect with holiness. Since all religions exclude homosexuality, it is doomed to be difficult for most people to receive it. After all, religious belief is an essential matter in human life. More people believe in religion rather than believing in the right of homosexuality. Moreover, homosexuality is contrary to the human natural physiological phenomenon; most people are hard to accept it. It is absolutely correct to protect homosexuals’ rights and not harm them. This is also the most realistic thing under the current conditions. However, leftist politicians demand that homosexuals’ rights will be unconditionally equal to normal people for the sake of universal values. They promote homosexual education in elementary schools and believe that homosexuality is a normal phenomenon; it is all wrong. Doing so had hurt the rights of most people and made many ignorant children curious to try this so-called normal phenomenon. How harm and trauma does it cause to normal children, and how much perversion does it bring to society? For the sake of their so-called greatness, these leftist politicians have ruined many social climates and mutilated many teenagers. If we want to investigate them further, they are already committing a crime.

Our requirement for any politician who stresses universal value only is to pay equally. If you want others to pay, then you must pay a corresponding proportion. It is impossible for other people to sacrifice their property, even lives, and you sit idle and enjoy the benefits. For example, we can ask Obama to live in Chicago instead of moving to Washington. Of course, he can live in a luxury villa with tight security. You can’t ask him to live like an ordinary black man; this is unrealistic. However, how much does he loves black people? How eagerly does he pursue equality for all? If he doesn’t live in Chicago? Where does he live? Or we can ask Merkel to adopt some refugees because of how much She likes refugees and how eagerly she pursues universal values. She can’t let refugees harass her compatriots, but she seems nothing.

To judge whether a politician really believes in universal values and “political correctness” or seeks his own interests in the name of those, we can compare his proposition with the content of the Bible because the universal values come from the Bible. If the proposition advocated by a politician is much different from the Bible, it must be questionable. For example, when a politician puts the rights of homosexuals and transgender above normal people, it can be concluded that he is a hypocritical politician. He waves a moral stick solely for his own benefit because their options are too different from the Bible’s contents. You can claim to respect the rights of homosexuals and transgender, but if you put their rights above normal people and preach their way of life everywhere, there is absolutely a problem. We should not hate homosexuals and transgender, but it is impossible to beautify them and abet becoming them. This is too different from the Bible and absolutely contrary to the common sense of human relations. Because of the limitation of our knowledge, it is difficult for us to distinguish what faith is it? What are the universal values and “political correctness of empty and void”? What should I do? Don’t worry; compare these politicians’ ideas with the Bible.

These leftist politicians preach universal values everywhere and hope to build a new society with universal values. It can only be said that it is daydreaming and bringing endless disasters to humans because there are no universal values. All these universal values are unique to the Christian world. Without the condition of the Christian faith, these universal values, “Political correctness,” can only be water without a source and will soon dry up.