强推宗教自由给人类带来灾难，这已经在现实生活中发生 （中英文版）

从以上三点可以看出洛克是非常清醒、锐利的，不愧为影响世界几百年的大思想家，不知那些认为第一修正案的，“不设立国教，不得妨碍宗教自由”，是针对所有宗教的最高法院法官们，有没有看过洛克的《论宗教宽容》。④

从这些论述推理开来，我们可以根据洛克的思想认为，并不是非基督教不能在美国传教，而是政教合一的宗教不能在美国传教，因为它对其他宗教，对国家都可能造成巨大的伤害，所以政教合一的宗教，不应在宪法第一修正案保护之列。而且这里洛克也明确指出，伊斯兰教就是政教合一的宗教，不在宗教宽容的范围内，因为他们要求教徒服从教会，而不是行政长官。我们前几个章节也有论述过，伊斯兰教没有任何宗教自由的概念，他们的教义是国家与教会的统一，国家就是教会，教会就是国家，根本就不允许其他宗教存在，所以伊斯兰教，根本就不在洛克的宗教宽容之列，所以人类历史上，从来没有普世的宗教自由。

在现实生活中我们可以看到，默克尔等左派政治家，为了彰显自己的仁慈、伟大，追求宗教自由，国家的多元化，他们认为能够体现更多的博爱，融合了更多宗教与文化的国家，才是伟大的国家，他们所要建立的也就是这种国家，这当然也是一种“政治正确”，很伟大、崇高，但是在目前条件下同样无法实现，因为至目前为止，人类并没有普世的宗教自由。于是当他们强行引入大量的伊斯兰难民，实践自己的理念时，由于没有考虑到，伊斯兰教根本就没有宗教自由的概念、没有任何兄弟之爱的内容、甚至还有许多攻击基督徒的教义，给德国社会带来巨大的灾难。伊斯兰教徒在少数时隐忍不发，当人口逐渐占据多数时，就越来越要求以自己的教义行事，肆意攻击异教徒——普通德国人，强奸、杀人等犯罪比例飙升，圣诞节也是在戒备森严中渡过，许多人痛苦不堪，可是默克尔等人根本就不考虑这些，他们为了凸显自己的伟大、政治正确，宁愿让德国陷入灾难中。

而且，同样，德国最高法院法官出于“政治正确”，出于所谓的宗教自由，保护少数非基督教的权利，竟然认为伊斯兰教中，允许少女婚姻的教义符合宪法，这些德国最高院的法官，只能以混蛋来形容，他们是一些非常自私的人，他们为了彰显自己的所谓公平公正，贡献出自己少女同胞的命运，这些德国少女也就成为他们走上神坛的祭品。可他们的行为公平正义吗？他们公平正义的标准是什么？其实他们的标准就是空洞、空乏的理性，就是所谓的“政治正确”，可是这是明显违反人伦常理的，不知正确在何处，只能证明一点，这种“政治正确”绝对是错误的，宗教自由不可能针对任何宗教，因为宗教中也有邪教，目前没有普世宗教自由的条件，根本就不可能实现这个“政治正确”，允许未成年的少女嫁给大胡子大叔的，绝对是个邪教，只能说这些德国法官被政治正确糊涂的脑袋。其实这些德国法官的行为，已经不是公平正义的问题了，而是彻头彻尾的犯罪，他们将被永远钉在人类的耻辱柱上，他们如果继续这样下去的话，只能造成德国的分裂与混乱，甚至物极必反产生一个希特勒式的强人，这些绝非危言耸听。

德国这个民族，我也一直强调它处于基督教的边缘地带，信仰稀薄，所以德国人很容易被“政治正确”的耀眼光芒，闪烁得不敢异议，于是一而再，再而三地选择默克尔，选择这些左派政治家。这就与美国沉默的大多数坚定地选择川普，形成鲜明的对比，美国人有着虔诚的信仰，深厚的基督教根基，不会轻易被“政治正确”空洞、空乏的概念所迷惑，因为政治正确中的大多数内容，与圣经是相违背的，真正的基督徒根本无法容忍，让非基督徒来侵占自己的家园，凌辱自己的子女，这在圣经中是根本不允许的事，。

由于宗教信仰是人类生活中最重要的事，宗教信仰的冲突经常是寸土必争、你死我活，所以目前这种条件下，实现完全彻底的宗教自由，是根本不可能的事，也许是非常多个千年之后的事。不顾现实情况，强行推行多宗教共存的多元化社会，必将给普通人带来巨大的灾难，宗教自由、多元化将使整个国家处于混乱、撕裂中，失去了原有的宁静与安宁、和平与幸福，使我们长期处于动荡不安之中，随时可能失去生命，这样国家又有何用？一个国家的存在的意义，不是宗教自由、多元化之类的“政治正确”，而是首先要保证稳定与秩序，和平安宁，人们能够自由自在地幸福生活，这是几千年来人类社会的首要目标，若这些无法做到，那么国家的存在也就失去了意义，社会最基本的要求都无法保证，那么我们要这个国家何用？

其实我们这个时代所要做的事，并不是什么宗教自由，而是每一个宗教都反思自己，是不是将兄弟之爱作为教义的根本，如何使自己的宗教体现兄弟之爱。例如上面的例子，允许未成年少女与大胡子大叔的婚姻，是否是兄弟之爱？是否会给少女带来终生的伤害？这样的教义合理吗？其次，我们每一个人要坚信自己原有的信仰，遵循基本的人伦常理，不要被“政治正确”的伟大光环闪耀得迷失了方向，至少不能如这些德国最高法院法官一般，以宗教自由的名义，将罪恶引入一个正常的社会。一种宗教要让别人接受，首先要自问自己的教义，是否充满着兄弟之爱，自己生活的国家，是否是一个充满兄弟之爱的和平国度，自己的国家由于教义纷争，时常处于战争状态，而且不承认宗教自由，不允许基督教等异教的存在，那你有何理由要求基督教国家允许你的存在？你有何理由将战争带到基督教国家？难道基督教国家就是个傻子？任由你索取，不能质疑，任由你伤害，不能自卫，天下有这种好事吗？所以说基督教社会，在这些白左政治家的领导下，极有可能物极必反，给人类社会带来巨大灾难。

From these arguments, we can see, according to Locke’s theory, it is not that non-Christians cannot preach in the United States, but the Theocracy cannot spread in the United States. Because it may cause great harm to other religions and the country, the Theocracy should not be protected by the constitution’s first amendment. And here, Locke also clearly points out that Islam is a Theocracy and can not be put in the scope of religious tolerance because they ask the believers to obey the church, not the chief executive. We have also discussed in the previous chapters that Islam has no concept of religious freedom. Their doctrine is the unity of the state and the church. The state is the church; the church is the state; no other religions are allowed to exist at all. Therefore, Islam is not among Locke’s religious tolerance, so there has never been universal religious freedom in human history.

In real life, we can see that left-wing politicians such as Merkel pursue religious freedom and diversify their country to show their kindness and greatness. They believe that a country that embodies more philanthropy and integrates more religions and cultures is great. What they want to establish is such a country. This idea is a “political correctness” and is fabulous and noble. Still, it cannot be realized under the current conditions because human beings have no universal religious freedom so far. When they forcibly introduced a large number of Islamic refugees to practice their ideas, it brought great disaster to German society because Islam had no concept of religious freedom, no content of brotherhood love, and even had many doctrines of attacking Christians. Islamists can bear when they are in the minority, but when the population gradually becomes the majority, they increasingly act on their own doctrines and wantonly attack infidels–ordinary Germans. The crimes such as rape and homicide soared. Christmas was also in vigilance. Many people suffer, but Merkel and others do not consider this at all. In order to highlight their greatness and political correctness, they would rather let Germany fall into disaster.

And similarly, out of “political correctness,” the so-called freedom of religion, and protecting the rights of a few non-Christians, the judges of the German Supreme Court ruled that the doctrine of girls’ marriage in Islam is in accordance with the constitution. These judges can only be described as bastards. They were very selfish people who wanted to show their so-called fairness and justice. And they contributed to the fate of young girls of compatriots, and these German girls became sacrifices for their going to the altar. However, are their actions fair and just? What is the standard of their fairness and justice? In fact, their standard is empty and void of rationality, namely “political correctness,” but it is obviously contrary to the common sense of human ethics. I don’t know why the judgment is right; it can only prove that this “political correctness” is absolutely wrong. Religious freedom cannot contain any religion because there are also cults in religion. And there exists no condition of universal religious freedom at present; It is impossible to realize this “political correctness” at all. It is a cult that allows young girls to marry uncles with ample beards. They can only say that these German judges are confused by “political correctness.” In fact, these German judges’ actions are no longer a matter of fairness and justice but a complete crime. They will be forever nailed to the pillar of shame of humans. If they continue to do so, they can only cause division and chaos in Germany and even produce a Hitler-type strong man in extreme circumstances. These are not alarmists.

As a nation, I have always emphasized that Germany is on the brink of Christianity, and its Christian faith is thin. Therefore, it is easy for Germany to be dazzled by the shining light of “political correctness”. So once and again, they choose Merkel and other left politicians. This contrasts sharply with the silent majority of the United States who firmly chose trump. Americans have a pious faith and a deep Christian foundation and will not be easily confused by the concept of empty and void political correctness. Most political correctness contents are contrary to the Bible, and real Christians are intolerable. The Bible does not allow to let non-Christians to encroach on Christian homes and insult their children.

Since religious belief is the most important matter in human life, the conflict of faith always lets people fight tooth and nail and to death. Therefore, it is impossible to achieve complete religious freedom; perhaps it can be realized many thousands of years later. However, regardless of the reality, the forcible implementation of a pluralistic society of multi-religious coexistence will inevitably bring massive disasters to ordinary people. Religious freedom and pluralism will cause the entire country chaos and tear it to pieces, losing its original tranquility and serenity, peace and happiness, throwing ordinary people into turmoil permanently, and anyone could lose their life at any time. So what is the role of a country? The essence of a country is not “political correctness,” such as religious freedom and pluralism, but first of all, to ensure stability and order, peace and tranquility, and people can live freely and happily. It has been the primary goal of human society for thousands of years. If these cannot be fulfilled, then the existence of a country will be meaningless; the most basic requirements of society cannot be guaranteed, so what use is this country?

In fact, what we need to do in this era is not religious freedom, but every religion reflects on itself, whether it regards brotherly love as the foundation of its doctrine or makes its own religion realize brotherly love. For example, how should brotherly love allow the marriage of an underage girl and the bearded uncle in the above example? Will it bring harm to girls for life? Is this doctrine reasonable? Secondly, each of us must firmly believe in our original beliefs, follow basic human ethics, and not lose ourselves in the great halo of “political correctness”. At least we are unlike these German Supreme Court judges, introducing evil into normal society in the name of religious freedom. Whether or not people accept your religion? You must first ask yourself whether your doctrine is full of brotherly love, whether the country you live in is a peaceful country full of brotherly love, or if your country is often at war due to doctrinal disputes. Moreover, your country denies religious freedom, and pagan religions such as Christianity are not allowed. Then what reason do you have to ask the Christian country to enable your existence? What reason do you have to bring the war to a Christian country? Is the Christian country a fool? Let you ask for; they can’t question you, let you hurt, and they can’t defend themself. Is there such a good thing in the world? Therefore, under the leadership of these left politicians in the Christian society, it is highly likely that everything will reverse, bringing large disasters to human society.