"the course of Western Civilization"

基督教决定西方历史,社会制度(中英文版)

《西方文明的历程》《购买本书》

第一部.总论与英国革前

第一章.宗教与人生

第二节.宗教决定历史

  

伟大的亨廷顿,基督教决定西方历史(中英文版)

 

有了这些基础我们再来论述为什么信仰大于政治理念。有人追求一些超然于宗教信仰的所谓普世政治理念,诸如民主、自由、人权等,但是政治理念只是哲学家、思想家虚构出来的产物,只是一些概念与词语,对于不识字或者虽识字却不关注者根本就不知为何物,根本就不可能产生什么影响,这些我将在第二章中以整章的篇幅论述。人类由于贪婪堕落的人性只遵从于物质刺激、享乐,而不是任何理念,更不用说政治理念了,所以政治理念不可能决定我们的生活,决定人类的历史。人类可以为物质基础,经济利益而战,因为这些是实实在在的财富、享乐,但是绝不可能为了政治理念而战,因为它们只是一些虚无空洞的概念,为了信仰充当人肉炸弹是很常见的事,而为了政治理念充当人肉炸弹却闻所未闻。不过你不得不承认人类社会总会一些诗人、精英将献身理念作为一种生活方式,但是诗人、精英毕竟是少数,这也是为什么他们倍感孤独、委屈的原因,经常感叹为了普世真理,普世价值洒尽热血,而芸芸众生却没有半点涟漪回响,实在令让人心酸心寒,殊不知这正是人间常理,理念对大多数人来说一无是处也根本不可能为它们牺牲。英国电影《阿拉伯的劳伦斯》描写了一位追求普世价值的诗人,前往阿拉伯地区传播自由民主的政治理念,毫无效果,反而被当地的阿拉伯人鸡奸,有一张剧照是他木然地瘫倒在沙漠上,屈辱、绝望,极其震撼,这就是理想与现实的悲剧性冲突。

欢迎前往购买《西方文明的历程》中英文版

说到这里可能马上就有人疑问,英国革命、美国革命、法国革命、拉美民族独立战争难道不是为了政治理念而战吗?其实这个问题就是本书的主要内容,英国革命、美国革命并不是为了政治理念更主要是为了信仰而战,为了信仰中隐含的自由平等而战。英国革命源于主教之战,起因就是查理一世强行在苏格兰推广主教制,引起信奉长老会的苏格兰人不满,于是爆发反抗战争,史称主教之战。接下来查理一世又想在英格兰推广阿米尼教派及主教制,引起英格兰清教徒的不满并最终爆发内战,在革命最低潮,最危急的时刻,正是克伦威尔率领的主要由清教徒组成的模范军,为了自由平等的宗教信仰,为了上帝的荣耀,舍生忘死奋力拼杀才扭转了战局将查理一世送上断头台,并以圣经为模板,进行了一系列共和政治的实践。而美国革命中大多数殖民地一再退让,寻求与母国和解,希望与英国保持最原始的殖民地与宗主国关系,但是一来由于当时的英国国王乔治三世愚蠢固执,想彻底征服殖民地,不愿做任何退让,二来由于新英格兰四州的清教徒追求自由平等的宗教信仰,使他们毫不妥协,并且自发地一次次用枪声推动革命进程,最后才促成美国独立,这些本书接下来将详尽地阐述。而法国革命毫无人性的大屠杀与中国的农民起义相似,是一种报复性的宣泄,很难将他们与政治理念联系一起。拉美民族独立后的现状令人很难相信那些领导人有什么政治理念,更多是挂着政治理念而实际只是为了自己的物质利益、个人荣誉、权力,这已经是另一个话题,这里就不多说了。

这里还要补充说明一点的是,中国的农民起义不属于任何政治理念,也不属于任何经济利益之争,只是为了生存下去的本能反应,或者说多年来被残酷压迫的报复性反弹,长期在儒家等级制下最底层的农民,尝尽了人间所有的苦难、艰辛、屈辱,人格被长期扭曲,尊严被肆意践踏,特别是王朝的末期,王权及官僚阶层对他们极其残忍的压榨剥削,秦收天下兵器,铸十二铜人,元朝连菜刀也要管制,目的就是使他们无条件地接受任何的压榨剥削,甚至不能有一丁点的反抗,只能是被压榨得剩下皮包骨头然后等死,精英阶层此时彻底撕下儒家的伪装展示人性赤裸裸的丑陋,罪恶。因而被压榨到极限的农民阶层的反弹也极为残忍野蛮,这完全是一种报复性的反弹,将一辈子所受的屈辱、羞辱、耻辱完全地发泄出来,最明显就是张献忠的屠川,与李自成的仿朱姓者杀,中国改朝换代的大动荡、大厮杀、大撕裂以人间地狱来形容一点不为过,但确实与任何政治理念无关。

我从来不会政治正确地认为所有的宗教都平等,因为真真切切、明明白白的事实就是,有的宗教确实野蛮愚昧,而有的宗教确实文明理性,为什么要昧着自己的良心说话,为什么要颠倒黑白、混淆是非,如果因为这是政治正确,那么这种政治正确绝对是大错特错的,因为人类不可能有昧着良心、颠倒黑白、混淆是非的所谓政治正确。亨廷顿在《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》明确指出,“冷战后的欧洲以天主教国家为标准划分西欧,中欧,东欧,西欧就是传统的天主教国家,包括法国、德国、意大利、西班牙等大多数主要国家,而中欧是指曾经的天主教国家,指匈牙利、波兰、捷克、斯洛伐克四国,而东欧就是指东正教国家指罗马尼亚、保加利亚二国,欧盟明确表示除了波罗的海三国外不将其他前苏联加盟共和国接纳为成员国,而波罗的海三国是传统的天主教国家自然例外,同时推迟东正教的罗马尼亚与保加利亚加入欧盟的申请,优先考虑中欧四国的申请,欧盟将与西方文明范围相重合,正如欧洲历史上曾经发生的一幕一样,而且北约将不接纳罗马尼亚,保加利亚为成员国也是尊重俄罗斯为东正教核心国家的地位。”这里亨廷顿已经将宗教作为划分欧洲分界线的主要依据,以宗教为依据划分欧洲的政治版图。①

欢迎前往购买《西方文明的历程》中英文版

我们再来看看亨廷顿是如何论述西方文明的,他认为的西方文明包括这几个方面,“古希腊罗马的古典遗产、天主教和新教、欧洲语言、精神权威与世俗权威的分离、法制、社会多元化、代议机构、个人主义。” 这里天主教与新教赫然在列。②亨廷顿在谈到全世界对自由民主的接受程度时,他认为,“此外,美国、西欧主要国家和国际机构的政策和行动,也对西班牙、葡萄牙、许多拉丁美洲国家、菲律宾、南朝鲜和东欧民主制度的建立起了帮助作用。民主化在基督教和西方影响强大的国家最为成功。新的民主政权在主要信奉天主教和新教的南欧和中欧最可能保持稳定,在拉丁美洲稳定性较差。在东亚,信奉天主教和受到美国极大影响的菲律宾于80年代回到了民主国家的行列。同时,南朝鲜和台湾的基督教领袖们也在推动民主化运动的发展。正如前面已经指出的,稳定的民主制度在前苏联,波罗的海诸共和国取得了成功;在东正教诸共和国中,民主制度的稳定程度彼此有相当大的差别,并且难以预测;穆斯林国家的民主前景则很暗淡。至90年代,除了古巴,其他大多数信奉西方基督教和基督教影响强大的国家都开始了向民主制的转变,但非洲是例外。”这些观点与我几乎一致,也是本书一直强调的观点,自由平等来自于基督新教,因而与基督新教社会的契合度最高,而拉丁美洲的天主教文化与自由平等貌合神离颇为冲突,自由平等与伊斯兰社会最为冲突,而非洲的原始部落根本就不知自由平等为何物。③

亨廷顿认为对美国这个西方文明的最大承载者的主要威胁,是国内的多元主义文化,由于大量的移民坚持自己的信仰造成的多元文化,削弱了基督教的影响,这将使美国衰弱甚至崩溃分裂成多个国家,这是《文明冲突》一书最精彩的部分,这也是目前美国陷入政治困境的主要原因,但是很少有人认识到这一点,很少有人理解亨廷顿的睿智。亨廷顿在书中还一直强调文明的冲突,西方文明与伊斯兰世界的冲突,西方文明与亚洲新兴经济力量的冲突等。我这里大量篇幅引用亨廷顿《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》一书的内容,主要想指出的是,亨廷顿在《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》中的许多预见如今已经成为事实,证明他是一位伟大的,极有远见的思想家、政治家。从我们引用的内容可以看出亨廷顿认为宗教对文明有着至关重要的影响,而且也很明显地表明了西方文明就是基督教文明,但是亨廷顿从来不明确表示文明冲突就是宗教冲突,不敢说西方文明就是基督教文明,为什么?因为政治正确。

新当选美国总统的川普是美国最不讲政治正确的政治家,他为美国基督徒设立国家祈祷日,表示要捍卫美国的宗教自由,反击任何对信仰的攻击。其实从他禁止伊斯兰教国家入境签证引起的纠纷可以看出,他捍卫的宗教自由就是基督教的自由,反击的是任何对基督教的攻击,可是他同样从来不敢说美国是基督教立国,美国是一个基督教国家,所有这些也是因为政治正确。明显的事实也不能说,不敢说,这就是政治正确的伟大魔力,政治正确是什么我下面章节还会有详细的解释,我这里只是略微简略介绍下。政治正确来自于人类最原始、最纯粹的理想,人类在贪婪堕落的人性下面,残留的天堂中最美好的记忆,伊甸园中最美好的幻影,一些谁也不敢反驳的理念,例如人人平等,即使现实中很明显人与人是不平等的,但是我们也不敢随便说出,明显感觉人与人不平等这种想法十分别扭,却不知错在何处。可事实就是如此又何错之有,可为什么又会别扭呢?因为它触碰了人类最美好的理想,来自灵魂深处,宇宙深处的最美好的理想。为什么说政治正确有时是不正确的?因为无条件的政治正确只能使人忘了人类的本性,一个同样是人人平等,人人都有的本性——贪婪堕落,这是人类告别美好的天堂、伊甸园,告别美好的理想来到了尘世的原因,所以政治正确是一个非常复杂的概念,它牵扯到前世今生,天堂尘世的复杂关系?在当今的美国社会,你可以随便骂白人却不能骂黑人,一骂就是种族歧视,其实黑人与白人一样,他们的人性同样是贪婪堕落的,无条件的政治正确只能是鼓励黑人贪婪堕落的人性,这对黑人也不见得是一件好事,美国社会自马丁•路德•金平权法案以来,黑人地位又改变了多少?不仅仅地位没有明显的改变,还更加剧了种族间的冲突,这些在下面章节还有详细阐述,这里我只先介绍这些。

欢迎前往购买《西方文明的历程》中英文版

可为了政治正确连事实都不能说的社会还是真正的社会吗?一个事实都不敢承认的学者还称得上学者吗?虽然我对亨廷顿极为敬佩,但是对他不敢阐述一个明显的事实深为遗憾。如果问我什么决定西方历史的进程?我会毫不犹豫的回答,宗教、宗教的冲突,如果问我何种宗教最接近文明、理性,我同样可以毫不犹豫地回答,基督教、基督新教。这些没必要遮遮掩掩、羞羞答答,事实就是事实,为什么不能承认。其实我也不是基督徒,只是这些年在探索西方文明的历程中才逐渐了解基督教,并且随着研究的深入,一步步被吸引并相信它的教义,但是由于心中还有许多中国人传统的佛踪道影,所以从不敢自称为基督徒,但是我可以明确地肯定,基督教二千多年来执掌着西方的文明之光,并且二千多年来一直引领人类前行,带领人类从野蛮愚昧走向文明理性,没有基督教如今的人类还处于怎样的世界?非洲的原始部落?南美洲的丛林帝国?还是沉迷于三寸金莲,三妻四妾的中国士大夫?

注:

①引用自《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》新华出版社出版,塞缪尔·亨廷顿著,周琪、刘绯、张立平、王圆 译。49页

②引用自《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》新华出版社出版,塞缪尔·亨

廷顿著,周琪、刘绯、张立平、王圆 译。49页

③引用自《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》新华出版社出版,塞缪尔·亨

廷顿著,周琪、刘绯、张立平、王圆 译。170页-171页

欢迎大家打赏

年轻时痴迷于武侠小说,有一个武侠梦,跟着师傅,带着小师妹,行走江湖,浪迹天涯,看尽人生百态,笑纳人间风云,在师傅的呵斥,小师妹的嗔骂中渡过一天又一天。不过再怎样洒脱不羁也要生活,除了卖艺外武侠没有其他谋生手段,于是在繁华热闹的场所,总看到我们卖艺的身影。每次卖艺后最常说的一句话是,“各位大哥,大姐,有钱的捧个钱场,没钱的捧个人场”。钱场就是现在的打赏,人场就是转发。只是如今已是油腻的中年大叔,梦想虽在,但再也无法实现,只能寄托在网络上。于是文章就是我的武功,公众号平台就是卖艺场,每发一篇文章就是一次卖艺,每次卖完艺后都非常希望得到大家的打赏与转发,所以在这里向大家拱拱手说,“有钱的捧个钱场,没钱的捧个人场”。也许人生本是个轮回,在这里我也实现了前世卑微而又有点意思的武侠人生。

这是新的微信赞赏码,在这艰难时刻更需要大家的大力支持

这是针对全球所有微信,支付宝朋友的赞赏码,呈现是美元金额,

这是针对海外朋友的paypal赞赏号,欢迎大家通过这个帐号打赏

https://www.paypal.me/readjoyinc

Christianity determines western history

 

With these foundations in mind, let’s discuss why faith is more important than political ideas. Some people pursue so-called universal political ideas beyond religious beliefs, such as democracy, freedom, human rights, etc., but political ideas seem only the products of philosophers and thinkers’ fiction, just some concepts and words. They can’t impact people’s lives at all, those who can’t read or are illiterate. I will discuss this in Chapter 2 throughout a whole chapter. Because of the greed and degeneration of human nature, humans only adhere to material pleasure and enjoyment, not any ideas, let alone political ideas, so political ideas cannot determine our lives and human history. Humans can fight for material basis and economic interests because these are real wealth and enjoyment. They never fight for political ideas because these ideas are just empty concepts. Being a human bomb for faith is very common, but being a human bomb for political ideas is unheard of. But you have to admit that human society will always have some poets and elites who dedicate themselves to the ideas as a way of life. Still, poets and elites are a minority, after all, which is the reason why they feel lonely and aggrieved. They often lament that they spill all their blood for the universal truth, universal values. However, tons of people don’t ripple around, which really makes them sad and chilling. Why is this? Because they do not know that this is the world’s common sense; the ideas are nothing to most people; it is impossible for most people to sacrifice anything for the ideas. The British film “Lawrence of Arabia” depicts a poet who pursues universal values and goes to the Arab to spread the political ideas of freedom and democracy but to no avail. Instead, he is sodomized by the local Arabs. a still photo is extremely shocking that he lies numbly in the desert, humiliating and insulting. This is the tragic conflict between ideal and reality.

Welcome to https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BQF77K3D to buy the Kindle ebook“the course of western civilization(essence version)” 

Some people may immediately question if the British Revolution, the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the Latin American War of National Independence did not fight for political ideas? In fact, this question is the main content of this book. The English and American revolutions were beyond political ideas, mainly for faith, for the freedom and equality implied in faith. The English Revolution originated from the War of Bishops. The cause was that Charles I forcibly promoted the bishopric in Scotland,  which aroused the discontent of the Scottish who believed in Presbyterianism and broke out into a war of resistance called the Battle of the Bishops. Next, Charles I wanted to promote Arminianism and episcopacy in England, which roused the English Puritans’ resentment and eventually erupted into civil war. Finally, at the revolution’s lowest and most critical moment, it was the model army led by Cromwell, mainly composed of Puritans. They sacrificed their lives fighting for the religion of freedom, equality, and the glory of God. In the end, they turned the tide of the war, sent Charles I to the guillotine, and used the Bible as a model to carry out a series of practices of republican politics. During the American Revolution, most colonies again gave way to seeking reconciliation with their home country and hoped to maintain the most primitive relations reflecting colonies and suzerain with Britain.

On the one hand, the stupidity and stubbornness of the then British King George III wanted to conquer the colonies completely. Therefore, he was unwilling to make any concessions. On the other hand, because of the religious beliefs of the Puritans in the four New England states who pursued freedom and equality, they did not compromise. They spontaneously used the sound of gunfire to push the revolutionary process again and again. The revolutionary process, which finally led to American independence, will be elaborated on in detail in the rest of this book. The inhumane massacres of the French Revolution were similar to the peasant revolts in China. It is a kind of vindictive catharsis, and it is difficult to connect them to political philosophy. After independence, the temporary situation of the Latin American nations made it hard to believe those leaders had any political philosophy. They exploit those more for their own material interests, personal glory, and power. It is already another topic and will not be discussed here.

It should be added here that China’s peasant uprising did not belong to any political concept or conflict over economic interests. It was only instinctive to survive or a revengeful rebound for years of brutal oppression. The peasants long bottomed in the Confucian hierarchy and had tasted all the sufferings, misery, and humiliations of the world. Their personality had been distorted to warp, and dignity had been trampled on wantonly for a lifetime. Especially at the end of the dynasty, the royalty and bureaucrats brutally squeezed and exploited them. The Qin Dynasty collected the society’s weapons and cast twelve bronze men; the Yuan Dynasty even controlled the kitchen knife to squeeze and exploit them unconditionally. They could not even have a little resistance, only be squashed to only skin and bones and wait for death. At this time, the elite completely tore off the disguise of Confucianism to show the naked ugliness and evil of human nature. Thus, the rebound of the peasant class, which was extorted to the limit, was also extremely brutal and barbaric. It was a completely vindictive rebound that completely vented the humiliation, shame, and disgrace they had suffered all their lives. The most obvious were Zhang Xianzhong’s slaughter of Sichuan and Li Zicheng’s killing of those surnamed Zhu. It’s not an exaggeration to describe tumultuous upheaval, bloody killing, and brutal tearing of China’s dynasty change as hell on earth. Therefore, it really had nothing to do with any political philosophy.

I am never politically correct to think that all religions are equal because the actual and plain fact is that some religions are indeed barbaric and foolish, while others are indeed civilized and rational, so why should I speak against my conscience? Why should I reverse black and white and confuse right and wrong? If it is because of politically correct, then such political correctness is absolutely false. Humans can’t have so-called political correctness that we must speak against our conscience, reverse black and white, and confuse right and wrong. Huntington clearly pointed out in “The Clash of Civilizations and the Reconstruction of World Order” that “post-Cold War Europe is divided into Western Europe, Central Europe, and Eastern Europe by the criterion of Catholic countries, and Western Europe is the traditional Catholic countries, including most major countries such as France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, while Central Europe refers to the former Catholic countries, meaning Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia Eastern Europe is the Orthodox countries, including Romania and Bulgaria, the European Union has made it clear that in addition to the Baltic States, no other former Soviet republics will be admitted as member states, with the exception of the Baltic States, which are traditionally Catholic countries, while postponing the application of Orthodox Romania and Bulgaria to join the EU, giving priority to the application of the four Central European countries, the EU will be compatible with the scope of Western civilization. overlap, as has happened in a scene in European history, and NATO will not admit Romania, and Bulgaria as a member is also respecting Russia’s status as a core Orthodox country.” Here Huntington had already used religion as the main basis for dividing the political map of Europe.①

Welcome to https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BQF77K3D to buy the Kindle ebook“the course of western civilization(essence version)” 

Further, Let’s take a look at how Huntington discusses Western civilization. He believes that Western civilization includes these aspects: “the classical heritage of ancient Greco-Roman, Catholicism and Protestantism, European languages, the separation of spiritual and secular authority, legal system, social pluralism, representative institutions, and individualism.” Catholicism and Protestantism stand out here.②.When talking about the world’s acceptance of freedom and democracy, Huntington believed that “in addition, the policies and actions of the United States, major Western European countries and international institutions have also helped to establish democratic systems in Spain, Portugal, many Latin American countries, the Philippines, South Korea, and Eastern Europe, Where Christian and Western influence is strong. The new democratic regimes are most likely to remain stable in southern and central Europe, which mainly believe in Catholic and Protestantism, and less stable in Latin America. In East Asia, the Philippines, which believes in Catholicism and is greatly influenced by the United States, returned to democracy in the 1980s. At the same time, Christian leaders in South Korea and Taiwan are also promoting the development of democratization. As already pointed out, stable democracy has succeeded in the former Soviet Union and the Baltic republics; In the Eastern Orthodox republics, the stability of democratic systems is quite different from each other and difficult to predict; The prospects for democracy in Muslim countries are bleak. By the 1990s, except in Cuba, most other countries that believed in Western Christianity and Christianity had a strong influence there and began to change to democracy, except in Africa. “These views are almost consistent with mine, which has been emphasized in this book. Freedom and equality come from Christian Protestantism, so they have the highest degree of conformity with Christian Protestant society. Catholic culture of Latin America seems in conflict with freedom and equality, and freedom and equality conflict with Islamic Society. The primitive tribes in Africa have no idea at all what freedom and equality are.③

Huntington believes that domestic multiculturalism is the main threat to the United States, the largest carrier of Western civilization. The multiculturalism caused by many immigrants adhering to their beliefs weakens the influence of Christianity and might even collapse the United States into multiple countries. This is the most wonderful part of the Book “Conflict of civilizations”. This is also the main reason why the United States is falling into political trouble today. But few people realize this and understand Huntington’s wisdom. In his book, Huntington has always emphasized the conflict of civilizations, the clash between Western civilization and the Islamic world, the clash between Western civilization and emerging economic forces in Asia, etc. I quote extensively from Huntington’s book “The Clash of Civilizations and the Reconstruction of World Order” to point out that much of Huntington’s foresight in the book has now come true. It proves that he is a great and far-sighted thinker and politician. From what we quoted, we can see that Huntington believes that religion has a crucial influence on civilization and clearly shows that Western civilization is a Christian civilization. However, Huntington never explicitly states that the conflict of civilization equates to religious conflict. He dare not say that Western civilization is Christian civilization. Why? Because of political correctness.

The newly elected president of the United States, Trump, is the most politically incorrect politician in the United States. He set up a national prayer day for Americans, expressing his desire to defend American religious freedom and counter any attacks on the faith. In fact, from the disputes caused by his ban on entry visas from Islamic countries, it can be seen that the religious freedom he defended is the freedom of Christianity, and he will fight back against any attack on Christianity. However, he never dared to say that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and that America is a Christian country. All these stem from political correctness also. The apparent facts can not say, dare not say; this is political correctness’s incredible magic. What is political correctness? I will detail it in the following chapters and only briefly introduce it here. Political correctness comes from the most pristine and pure ideals of humans.

Under the greed and degeneration of human nature, humans remain the best memories of paradise, the most beautiful phantom of the Garden of Eden, and some ideas no one dares to refute, such as equality of all people. Even if it is obvious that people are unequal in reality, we dare not refuse it at will. We plainly feel that the idea of inequality between people is very awkward, but I don’t know what’s wrong. However, the inequality between people is a fact; where is it wrong? Why is it awkward? Because it touches the best ideal of humans, the best ideal from the depths of the soul and the universe. Why is political correctness sometimes incorrect? Because unconditional political correctness can only make people forget the nature of humans, a nature that is also equal to all, all people have a nature of greed and degeneration. It is the reason why humans leave the beautiful paradise and Eden, bid farewell to the beautiful ideal, and come to the earth. Therefore, political correctness is a complex concept involving the complex relationship between past and present, heaven and earth? In today’s American Society, you can scold whites but can not chide blacks. A chiding of blacks is racial discrimination. In fact, blacks are the same as whites; their human nature is also greedy and degenerate; unconditional political correctness can only encourage greed and degeneration of the human nature of blacks, which is not necessarily a good thing for blacks. Since the Martin Luther King Jr and Equality Act, How much has blacks’ status changed in American Society? Not only didn’t the status change significantly, but it also exacerbated the conflicts between races. These will be explained in detail in the following chapters. I only introduce them here.

Welcome to https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BQF77K3D to buy the Kindle ebook“the course of western civilization(essence version)” 

But for the sake of political correctness, is a society that can’t even tell the truth still a real society? Can a scholar who daren’t admit a fact be a scholar? Although I greatly admire Huntington, I deeply regret that he dared not to state an obvious fact. If you ask me what determines the course of Western history? I will not hesitate to answer the conflict between religions. If you ask me which religion is closest to civilization and rationality, I will also answer Christianity and Protestantism without a second thought. There is no need to speak in the circle or be Shilly-shally. The fact is the fact. So why can’t we admit it? In fact, I am not a Christian. It is only in the process of exploring Western civilization that I gradually understand Christianity.

With the deepening of research, I am attracted step by step and believe in its teachings. However, I never dare to call myself a Christian because there are many Chinese traditional Buddhist hints and Tao clues in my heart. However, I can ensure that Christianity has been in charge of the light of Western civilization for more than 2000 years and has been leading humans forward for more than 2000 years, guiding humans from barbarism and ignorance to civilization, and rationality. So what kind of world is it if there is no Christianity?Primitive tribes in Africa?The jungle empire of South America?Or Chinese scholar-bureaucrats who indulge in three-inch Golden Lotus and had three wives and four concubines?

Note:

①   Samuel Huntington “The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order”, Xinhua Publishing House, trans Zhou Qi, Liu Fei, Zhang Liping and Wang Yuan.P 49

②   Samuel Huntington “The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order”, Xinhua Publishing House, trans Zhou Qi, Liu Fei, Zhang Liping and Wang Yuan.P 49

③   Samuel Huntington “The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order”, Xinhua Publishing House, trans Zhou Qi, Liu Fei, Zhang Liping and Wang Yuan.P 170 – 171

 

 

未经允许不得转载:the course of Western Civilization » 基督教决定西方历史,社会制度(中英文版)

order "the course of western civilization"

emailreadjoy@outlook.com
error: 本站内容涉及版权,右键已被禁止。