What is political correctness ？and why is it wrong？

this is the conclusion based on the demonstration of the previous article of 800000 words. Political correctness is not reliable. Political correctness is not only the residual impression of human beings living a eternal life in heaven, but also an eternal dream reserved in human hearts. However, due to the greed and degeneration of human nature, it is difficult to realize it in real life, There is only one way to achieve this, that is, through pious belief, rather than the propaganda and advocacy of the secular government, or the incitement and the moral stick of leftists.

Why can’t the Islamic world have such concepts as equality, freedom, and human rights? Another important reason is that the church has an army, and the doctrine allows to conquer the heretics by killing. How can a church with an army and a religion allow killing having universal values such as equality, freedom, and human rights? When faith is combined with the sword, it is absolutely a terrible thing. We know that faith is the most fundamental matter of human beings; there is no room for compromise and negotiation in the pursuit of immortality, eternity, and the ultimate world. Sword is originally the ultimate weapon to solve disputes, and it can only be used when all negotiations fail, But in the Islamic world, the sword is the first weapon to settle disputes. The use of swords to resolve disputes also has its avails: that is, direct, simple, and effective. one hand with scriptures and the other with swords; if you disobey them, you will be killed. After the disobedient are eradicated, the rest will be obeyed, how happy it is. Even if you don’t accept it in your heart, you stoop to compromise and pretend to observe in order to survive, but then your descendants will be assimilated by their doctrines. Seeing your son become an Islamist who slaughters Christians will only cry your heart out and kick in the teeth. But most of the time, when the Islamists spread and conquer with swords, opponents also fight against and protect themselves with swords. Moreover, the Islamists also use swords for internal sectarian disputes. The bloody killing of their own sects is no less than the war between pagans. Therefore, the long-term war in the Islamic world has never stopped, So how can such a country have universal value?

Let’s continue to take a look at the things in Southeast Asia. These Southeast Asian countries have been colonized by Christian countries for a long time and have been infused with universal values such as equality and freedom. However, when the colonial rule was overthrown and the Christian suzerain withdrew, the non-Christianity in these countries was reborn and flourished. These Southeast Asian countries also were Islamic colonies earlier, and Islam spread by swords, which was efficient and effective exceedingly. Soon the Islamists in these countries made up the majority of the population. At this time, the situation was completely different. According to the theory, which religion is prior to political concepts, faith prefers to universal value; in line with the teachings of Islam, these countries gradually implemented the church law and unified the church with the state. The state is the church, and the church is the state. At this time, they completely abandoned the universal values of equality, freedom, and human rights, which were empty in their eyes. They implemented the religious blasphemy law and didn’t allow to make irresponsible remarks on Islam. How will these Southeast Asian countries develop? As you can imagine, I won’t go on.

We can see that leftist politicians such as Obama and Merkel seem generous and practice universal values, but they are all in a haughty manner, which only caused great harm to the country and society. For example, “equality for all” is an alleged universal value, a concept of “political correctness,” and a pleasant thing from heaven left behind our subconscious. People feel it is so mighty and lofty and believes that it is the ultimate aim of humans. Most of us dare not oppose this concept. But why do we feel strange when we think of such mighty and lofty concepts as the ultimate aim of humans deeply? Because these concepts do not stand by belief, they can not be achieved in reality under the present conditions. No religion thinks that all people’s rights are equal. It just is a hypocritical concept inferring by the politician, and even can be said, fantasying by the politician.

The purpose of these politicians is to highlight that they are greater than ordinary people. Although “equality for all people” seems an incomparable universal value, it can’t win support from most religious believers. After all, religious belief is an essential matter in human society. Therefore, the “equality for all” concept is plausible and can’t be put into practice. Without belief, they are just saying. These politicians never want to practice it; they just use it as a moral stick to strike others. At present, the unconditional “equality for all” has harmed society. In recent years, the continuous black riots in the United States obviously come from this “equality for all”. Another example, “homosexual rights” is also a universal value and “politically correct”. The minority of homosexuals require equal rights, the requirement is from equal rights for all, from the remnant but decent impression coming from human’s unconsciousness and seems proper. But from the perspective of faith, it is problematic because no religion recognizes that homosexuality is normal; it’s harder to connect with holiness. Since all religions exclude homosexuality, it is doomed to be difficult for most people to receive it. After all, religious belief is an essential matter in human life. More people believe in religion rather than believing in the right of homosexuality. Moreover, homosexuality is contrary to the human natural physiological phenomenon; most people are hard to accept it.  It is absolutely correct to protect homosexuals’ rights and not harm them. This is also the most realistic thing under the current conditions. However, leftist politicians demand that homosexuals’ rights will be unconditionally equal to normal people for the sake of universal values. They promote homosexual education in elementary schools and believe that homosexuality is a normal phenomenon; it is all wrong. Doing so had hurt the rights of most people and made many ignorant children curious to try this so-called normal phenomenon. How harm and distort does it cause trauma to normal children, and how much perversion does it bring to the whole society? For the sake of their so-called greatness, these leftist politicians have ruined many social ethe and mutilated many teenagers. If we want to investigate them further, they are already committing a crime.

Our requirement for any politician who stresses universal value only is to pay equally. If you want others to pay, then you must pay a corresponding proportion. It is impossible for other people to sacrifice their lives, even property, and you sit idle and enjoy the benefits. For example, we can ask Obama to live in Chicago instead of moving to Washington. Of course, he can live in a luxury villa with tight security. You can’t ask him to live like an ordinary black man; this is unrealistic. But how much he loves black people, how eagerly he pursues equality for all, if he doesn’t live in Chicago? Where does he live? Or we can ask Merkel to adopt some refugees, how much She likes refugees, how eagerly she pursues universal values. She can’t let refugees harass her compatriots, but she seems nothing.

To judge whether a politician really believes in universal values and “political correctness” or seeks his own interests in the name of those, we can compare his proposition with the content of the Bible because the universal values come from the Bible. If the proposition advocated by a politician is much different from the Bible, it must be questionable. For example, when a politician puts the rights of homosexuals and transgender above normal people, it can be concluded that he is a hypocritical politician. He waves a moral stick solely for his own benefit because their options are too different from the Bible’s contents. You can claim to respect the rights of homosexuals and transgender, but if you put their rights above normal people and preach their way of life everywhere, there is absolutely a problem. We should not hate homosexuals and transgender, but it is impossible to beautify them and abet normal people become them. This is too different from the Bible and absolutely contrary to the common sense of human relations. Because of the limitation of our knowledge, it is difficult for us to distinguish what faith is? What are the universal values and “political correctness” of empty and void? What should I do? Don’t worry; compare these politicians’ ideas with the Bible.

These leftist politicians preach universal values everywhere and hope to build a new society with universal values. It can only be said to be daydreaming and bring endless disasters to humans because there are no universal values in essence. All these universal values are unique to the Christian world. Without the condition of Christian faith, these universal values, “Political correctness,” can only be water without a source and will soon dry up.