为什么说桑德斯这些民主党政客是独夫民贼？将带领美国走向死亡之路（中英文版）

    昨天的文章发出后反响挺热烈的，一些朋友给予热情的赞扬，表示支持作者的观点，同时也有一些朋友质疑道，“您这些观点不就是反对社会的福利事业，反对公平正义，反对仁慈、博爱吗？不就是反对政府对贫富悬殊等不公平现象进行纠正吗？鼓励赤裸裸的剥削，鼓励社会的两极分化吗？” 其实这也是我希望大家阅读《西方文明的历程》《简介》《作者简介》整本书的原因，只有这样才可以理解作者的整体思想，而不是断章取义。我从来没有反对过仁慈博爱，公平正义，而是希望我们有真正的仁慈博爱，公平正义，不会被桑德斯这样的野心家、独夫名贼所利用。桑德斯这种大政府，高税收，政府掌握一切的模式，哈耶克早就论证了，而且被很多实践证实过了，是条通往奴役之路，由于高税收使政府掌握了庞大的社会财富，甚至可以说掌握了社会主要财富，于是政府，也就是桑德斯口口声声代表人民的组织，掌控了社会的一切，包括我们每个人的权利，于是，桑德斯这样的政府实际上就是奴隶主，一般百姓丧失所有的权利，实际是彻底沦为奴隶。

 欢迎光临https://readjoys.com/，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417633，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417609，购买中英文版《西方文明的历程》

   所以我一直以来都认为桑德斯是独夫名贼，利用人性的弱点，让人们把所有权力移交给政府，然后桑德斯就是总统，就是奴隶主了。有人问道桑德斯一个人怎么有那么大的能量？控制整个社会，这就是莫斯卡在《统治阶级》这本书中的主要思想，500个人组织起来就可以控制几万人甚至几十万个人的社会，更不要说整个组织起来的美国官僚机构了，这个机构将遵循利益共享，利益逐级分配的原则，可以很好管理，很好控制这个社会，这才是桑德斯的真正目的。今天我把两篇旧文整理一下，一起发表，详细阐述我的观点，也就是，我提倡真正的仁慈博爱，公平正义，反对政府通过强制税收，通过暴力收税来实行福利慈善事业，主张取消政府部门对全民医保等事业的垄断，由基督教会，佛教会或者其他一些民间慈善机构以自愿募捐的原则，通过竞争的方式进行真正的福利慈善事业，力所能及地实行真正的全民医保，免除大学贷款等。不是为了攥取权力的鼓吹煽动，同时也只有在竞争中，这也是我一贯强调的观点，只有在竞争中才可以保证资源不被浪费，才可以保证真正的仁慈博爱，公平正义。

  下面我另外二个反对桑德斯观点的理由。   我第2个反对桑德斯的理由是，慈善事业、慈善机构是来自基督教，是基督教教义的一种体现，富人当仁慈，穷人当忍让，基督教会鼓励捐献财富，认为捐献是通向天堂的捷径，所以慈善事业由基督教会来承担是理所当然的事。而且我个人理解也确实如此，特别自己一分一厘积攒下来的财富，都是心头肉，要把它们捐献出去，确实只有对圣经，对上帝真正信仰才可以做到。基督教这种募捐，慈善的传统对基督教本身也十分有利，让人们知道真正的信仰就是割舍弃自己的心头肉，就是要牺牲，而不是那种空乏的，站在道德制高点的夸夸其谈，真正的信仰是要有牺牲的，物质或者精神上。而且通过基督教会的慈善对穷人也有好处，同样可以增强基督信仰，让他们知道这些钱是信仰上帝的兄弟姐妹捐献的，是充满兄弟之爱的，是饱含着巨大牺牲的，也希望他们有钱后能够这样做，至少应该勤劳致富，不应该好吃懒做而致贫等。更主要的是，我们可以看到基督教的慈善是建立在自愿基础上的，基督教2000年历史上，从来没站在道德制高点上的强制逼捐，从来没有强制征税之类的事，因为任何东西如果不是自愿的，而是强迫的话，都是非常危险的，都很容易被如桑德斯一般的蛊惑家，煽动家所利用，违背圣经的教诲，贪恋邻人的财产，此时已经不是贪恋邻人了，而是直接抢劫霸占了，就是以人民的名义抢劫，以替天行道霸占，这是我反对桑德斯第二个原因。”

 欢迎光临https://readjoys.com/，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417633，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417609，购买中英文版《西方文明的历程》 

   许多朋友质疑我说，一个国家实行全民医保，实行从出生到死都享受高福利，像北欧，台湾那样，不是很幸福美好的生活吗？不就是我们追求的目标，为什么我一直要反对？是不是我鼓吹剥削，追求贫富悬殊，希望一个人吃人的社会，如果这样理解绝对是误解我的意思，所以我这里今天着重解释一下，也是我反对桑德斯的第三个原因。   “显然我从来不反对这种幸福的生活，而且极力追求这种理想，我只是怀疑说，北欧，台湾这种幸福生活能不能持久下去？特别对于美国这种人口众多，信仰复杂，多民族的国家能不能长久维持下去。昨天右派媒体爆料，桑德斯的理想正是我所说的民主社会主义模式，它的样板国家就是北欧瑞典，国家从出生到死将你的生活安排得好好的，但是超高税收，个人所得税高达65%，同时还有25%的消费税。而且瑞典作为一个几百万人口的小国，种族单一，信仰相似，并且有着几百年的新教传统，新教讲究天职，讲究敬业，勤劳致富等，再怎么样也熏陶了瑞典人几百年，瑞典人想好吃懒做也要三思而行，所以我想瑞典并不是大国的模板。而美国就是大国，3亿人口，而且大量的新移民，多种族，信仰复杂，在这样的国家实行瑞典的民主社会主义模式，确实是一大冒险。其他一些比瑞典大的，实行全民医保的国家，如加拿大，法国等，效果并不是理想，原因是名义上虽然是全民医保，可是资源实在有限，只能让大家预约排队，可时间非常长，例如在加拿大，据说人都病死掉，还没预约到。而委内瑞拉就更不要说了，它是最近这几年来坏经验的样榜。”   “ 其实我说的这些作为几十年参议员，应该可以算作政治家的桑德斯，不可能不清楚，主要原因的是大政府，全民医保，民主社会主义理念是他可以击败川普的唯一武器，不鼓吹都不行。”

 欢迎光临https://readjoys.com/，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417633，https://www.amazon.com/dp/1734417609，购买中英文版《西方文明的历程》 

欢迎大家打赏

年轻时痴迷于武侠小说，有一个武侠梦，跟着师傅，带着小师妹，行走江湖，浪迹天涯，看尽人生百态，笑纳人间风云，在师傅的呵斥，小师妹的嗔骂中渡过一天又一天。不过再怎样洒脱不羁也要生活，除了卖艺外武侠没有其他谋生手段，于是在繁华热闹的场所，总看到我们卖艺的身影。每次卖艺后最常说的一句话是，“各位大哥，大姐，有钱的捧个钱场，没钱的捧个人场”。钱场就是现在的打赏，人场就是转发。只是如今已是油腻的中年大叔，梦想虽在，但再也无法实现，只能寄托在网络上。于是文章就是我的武功，公众号平台就是卖艺场，每发一篇文章就是一次卖艺，每次卖完艺后都非常希望得到大家的打赏与转发，所以在这里向大家拱拱手说，“有钱的捧个钱场，没钱的捧个人场”。也许人生本是个轮回，在这里我也实现了前世卑微而又有点意思的武侠人生。

这是新的微信赞赏码，在这艰难时刻更需要大家的大力支持

这是针对全球所有微信，支付宝朋友的赞赏码，呈现是美元金额

这是针对海外朋友的paypal赞赏号，欢迎大家通过这个帐号打赏 https://www.paypal.me/readjoyinc

After yesterday’s article was published, the response was very enthusiastic. Some friends gave warm praise and expressed their support for the author’s views. At the same time,  

some friends questioned, “are your views against social welfare, fairness, justice, kindness, and fraternity? Are they not against the government’s correction of unfair phenomena such as the gap between the rich and the poor? Encourage naked exploitation and encourage social polarization?” In fact, this is the reason why I hope you can read the whole book “the course of western civilization(essence version)”  “buy the book”. Only in this way can you understand the overall thinking of the author rather than taking it out of context. I have never opposed benevolence, fraternity, fairness, and justice. Instead, I hope we will have real benevolence, fraternity, fairness, and justice and will not be used by ambitious careerists like sanders and famous thieves. Hayek has long demonstrated that Sanders is a model of big government, high taxes, and the government controlling everything, which many practices have proved. It is a road to slavery. Because high taxes enable the government to control huge social wealth, even the main wealth of society, the government, that is, the organization that Sanders keeps on representing the people, controls everything in society, including the rights of every one of us, In fact, a government like Sanders is an enslaver, and ordinary people lose all their rights; they are complete enslaved people.

           

Therefore, I have always thought that Sanders is a great thief. He takes advantage of the weakness of human nature to let people transfer all power to the government. Then Sanders is the president and the enslaver. Someone asked Sanders how he could have so much energy alone. Mosca’s main idea in his book “the ruling class” is how to control the whole society. When 500 people are organized, they can control the society of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people, not to mention the whole organized American bureaucracy. This organization will follow the principle of sharing interests and distributing interests level by level. It can well manage and control society. This is Sanders’ real purpose. Today, I elaborate on my views here that I advocate real benevolence, fraternity, fairness, and justice, oppose the government’s implementation of welfare and charity through compulsory taxation and violent taxation, and support abolishing the monopoly of government on universal medical insurance and other philanthropy, and let the Christian Church, Buddhist Church or some other non-governmental charitable organizations raise funds on a voluntary basis. Therefore, we can carry out real welfare and charity through competition, perform real universal medical insurance, and exempt university loans as far as we can. It is not the instigation and incitement to seize power. Only in the competition, which I have always emphasized, can we ensure that resources are not wasted and that we can ensure real benevolence, fraternity, fairness, and justice.

   

Here are two other reasons why I oppose Sanders’ views. My second reason against Sanders is that charities and philanthropy are from Christianity, which is an embodiment of the Christian doctrine. The rich should be kind, and the poor should be tolerant. The Christian Church encourages the donation of wealth and considers that donation is a shortcut to heaven. Therefore, it is natural for the Christian Church to undertake charities. Moreover, I personally understand that it is a real charity. In particular, the wealth I have Penny and penny laid up is my heart and soul, treasured possession; donating them is only based on true faith in the Bible and God. The tradition of fundraising and charity in Christianity is also very beneficial to Christianity itself. It lets people know that the true faith is to cut off and give up their own flesh and soul, that is, to sacrifice, rather than empty rhetoric on the moral high ground. True faith requires sacrifice, whether material or spiritual. Moreover, the charity of the Christian Church is also beneficial to the poor. It can also strengthen the Christian faith, letting them know that the money is donated by brothers and sisters who believe in God, full of brotherly love and great sacrifice; It was also hoped that they could do so after they get money. At least they should be rich through hard work and not be poor because of laziness. More importantly, we can see that the charity of Christianity is on the basis of voluntariness. In the 2000 years of the history of Christianity, there have never been mandatory donations from the moral high ground. There has never been forced taxation because anything that is not voluntary but forced is very dangerous. It is easy to be used by careerists and demagogues like Sanders, violating the teachings of the Bible and coveting the property of neighbors. Moreover, at this time, they directly robbed and occupied. They robbed in the name of the people and occupied in the name of acting on behalf of heaven. This is the second reason why I oppose Sanders. “

      picture      

Many friends questioned me, saying that a country that implements universal medical insurance and enjoys high welfare from birth to death, like northern Europe and Taiwan, isn’t a very happy and beautiful life! Is this the goal we pursue? Why do I always oppose it? Do I advocate exploitation, pursue the disparity between the rich and the poor, and hope that a society in which people eat people? If you understand this, you definitely misunderstand my meaning. Therefore, I will focus on explaining it today. This is also the third reason why I oppose Sanders. Obviously, I have never opposed this kind of happy life, and I do my best to pursue this ideal. I just doubt whether this kind of happy life in northern Europe and Taiwan can be sustained, especially in the United States, a country with a large population, complex beliefs, and multi-ethnic groups. Yesterday, the rightist media revealed that Sanders’ ideal is what I call the democratic socialist model. Its model country is Sweden, and other Nordic countries, which arrange your life well from the cradle to the grave, but the tax is extremely high; the personal income tax is as high as 65%, and the consumption tax is 25%. Moreover, as a small country with a population of several million, Sweden has a single race, similar beliefs, and a Protestant tradition of hundreds of years. Protestantism stresses bounden duty, dedication, and hard work. No matter what, it has influenced the Swedes for hundreds of years. The Swedes should think twice before they want to be lazy. Therefore, I think Sweden is not the template of a big country. The United States is a large country with a population of 300 million and a lot of new immigrants; they are multi-ethnic and have complex beliefs. It is indeed a considerable risk to perform the Swedish Democratic Socialist Model in such a country. Other countries, such as Canada and France, which are larger than Sweden and implement universal medical insurance, have not achieved satisfactory results. The reason is that although they are nominally universal medical insurance, they have limited resources and can only allow people to make appointments and queue up. However, the time is very long. For example, in Canada, it is said that people have died of illness and have not made an appointment. Venezuela, let alone Venezuela, is a good example of bad experiences in recent years. In fact, Sanders, who has been a senator for several decades and can be regarded as a politician, can’t be unclear. The main reason is that the big government, universal health care, and democratic socialist concept are the only weapons he can defeat Trump. He can’t do anything without advocating.

 

欢迎大家打赏（微信专用） 因为委托美国华人翻译本书的效果与想象中有出入，不得不投入大量时间自己翻译，也占用了很多时间，生活压力剧增，所以更加希望大家尽量打赏支持，尽快完成本书的英文版，为美国重回传统价值观，圣经信仰贡献力量，终极目的就是让人类重回正常的轨道，重回《圣经》、《道德经》等传统经书的轨道，大家永远生活在桃花源般的地方，再次希望并感谢大家的大力支持。

欢迎大家打赏（微信专用）

70后的每一个人几乎都痴迷过武侠小说，都有一个武侠梦，都喜欢浪迹江湖，四海为家，尝尽人生百态，笑看人间风云，与天地兮同在，与日月兮同光。不过很现实一个问题是武侠没钱，所以再怎么夸张，小说中，武侠也不得不经常四处卖艺挣钱，每次卖艺结束后最常说的一句就是，“有钱的捧个钱场，没钱的捧个人场”，于是就有哗哗的一阵掌声，这是人场，接着是一阵叮叮当当的声音，这是钱场，是打赏。我作为70后的一员同样有这些武侠梦，只是如今已是油腻的中年大叔，再也无法浪迹天涯尝尽人生百态了，只能在网络世界实现自己的武侠梦，文章就是我的武功，公众号平台就是演艺场，每发一篇文章就是一次卖艺，每次卖完艺后唯一希望就是大家的打赏与转发了，所以向大家拱拱手说，“有钱的捧个钱场，没钱的捧个人场。”