康德确实伟大，他的二律背反证明人类理性有缺陷，无力思考道德问题，人类一离开圣经，道德经这些经典，必将陷入变态疯狂中，美国的现实证明了这些(中英文版)

In the book“the course of western civilization(essence version)”“buy the book”, I have always emphasized Kant’s antinomy, namely, the problem of the limit of human rationality. Human rationality cannot think about the fundamental issues of infinity and morality; otherwise, there will be contradictions. Therefore, Kant believes that moral issues should be handed over to God and the eternal thing-in-itself; humans had better not touch morality. Morality is not an issue that humans can think about, let alone try to create morality. Otherwise, humans will fall into disorder and collapse. His famous statement is, “there are two things that always amaze me; one is the bright starry sky, the other is the moral law in our hearts.”

On the basis of Kant’s discussion, I have repeatedly stressed in the book “the course of western civilization(essence version)”“buy the book” that if humans leave the ancient classics from the depths of the universe, such as the “Bible” and the “Tao Te Ching”, life will lose its standard, thinking and thought will also go to extremes, and humans would split hairs, fall into a state of endless absurdity and weirdness. Therefore, on the basis of these discussions, we can well understand these absurd and bizarre things in the United States today.

Why do I say that human life will fall into absurdity and nonsense without the ancient classics such as the Bible and the Tao Te Ching? We take homosexuality as an example. In the Bible, it is clearly pointed out that homosexuality is a crime and sin. Of course, this does not mean that you can attack and kill homosexuality. The Bible also emphasizes principles of benevolence and kindness, so you should tolerate the existence of homosexuality as long as they do not excessively collapse the morality of society. But you are very wrong if you think homosexuality is a legal and reasonable existence and even equate it with the sacred heterosexual marriage. We allow homosexuality to exist on the basis of benevolence and kindness. If we then think that the existence of homosexuality is reasonable and legal, the world will fall into collapse and chaos. Why do I say that? Because of that reason, the American Psychological Association thinks of homosexuality as a normal phenomenon, is homosexuality only a matter between two people or within a group? It does not hurt the third party and has no adverse impact on society. Why can’t it exist reasonably? This explanation is indeed impeccable in reason. Rationality believes that only harm to others is sin or crime, which has nothing to do with the Bible.

OK, we also temporarily believe that the assertion that “sin and crime are harmful to others and have nothing to do with the Bible” is correct. Still, in this way, other crimes identified in the Bible, such as incest, group sex, animal intercourse, polygamy, and polygamy, are also reasonable and legal? Why are they not crimes? Because they also do not interfere with other people’s lives and hurt others, If homosexuality is reasonable and legal? Why are these phenomena not legal and reasonable?

Further on, isn’t Communist co-wife reasonable? Moreover, polygamy and Communist co-wife also meet the emperor’s dream of most people. The emperor has three palaces, six courtyards, 72 concubines, and get orgy every night. It is the dream life of most men. At this time, will it be fully realized? Of course, women’s dream of being Empress has also been satisfied. At this time, all women are Empress Wu, and can suck up countless men? Isn’t polygamy and Communist co-wife an ideal human society? The unrestricted ideas result after human thinking loses its standards and breaks up constraints, resulting in a society that will go to rack and ruin rites, such as a beast society.

In human history, there are many examples in which philosophers draw absurd or even terrible conclusions after thinking about moral issues, such as Nietzsche’s Superman theory. Nietzsche believes that Superman is the best person of humans and should rule humans and lead humans to fight and conquer. Then who should Superman lead to fight and conquer? Of course, it is the so-called inferior race; the coward in Nietzsche’s eyes is the idiot. Therefore, as the most loyal believer in Nietzsche’s philosophy, Hitler conquered the world and slaughtered Jews; which is reasonable?

Similarly absurd is Sartre’s “existence is reasonable”. Of course, Sartre thinks from the perspective of human origin and the essence of the world. However, due to the loss of the Bible’s standard, it is inevitable to infer that all existence is a reasonable phenomenon. In Sartre’s eyes, the world is similar to Chinese Taoism. The world at the beginning is “nothing”, and is turbid, so all being is reasonable. What humans can imagine and practice is reasonable, including his relationship with Beauvoir. That is to say, they were both lovers and had their own sexual partners. It is said that they often exchanged experiences and fun in sexual intercourse with others. It can only be said that it is much beyond the imagination of ordinary people. It is really ugly. I don’t know what the difference between this and a pornographic website is. However, they believed that they were engaged in a great and noble cause, practicing human new morality and future human lives. If the future humans are so messy, I would rather recluse in the temple, the green lights wither and shadow, than get involved in the bizarre world. Perhaps these are God’s will and arrangements. Let humans know his greatness. Without him, humans will not exist because the more humans think, the more crazy, the more collapse, chaos, and destruction. This is the so-called “God laughs when mankind thinks”.

After walking around such a big circle, we should understand why there are shocking scenes of drinking urine in public on the United States’ streets and explain why there is so much chaos in American society today. Because America is more and more worldly and far away from the Bible, there is more and more unlimited to thinking, and it is more and more absurd. The most fundamental reason is that human rationality is limited, and it is impossible to think about moral problems without a bottom line. Naturally, these white left and white Americans did owe blacks before, but white Americans also gave blacks a lot. Black Americans’ living welfare and overall income, especially the emergence of talents in every profession and trade, are far more than their peers in the African jungle.

If the blacks take the Bible as the standard, the love of brothers as the criterion, and have a tolerant attitude, they should feel grateful and act with benevolence and kindness. They should not ask too much or will go into an absurd situation. Without the Bible’s standard, the thought of both the white and the black is extreme and sharp. When the blacks think that the whites used to enslave, chain, whip, and even massacre them, the more they think about this, the more they can’t bear it. While the more the white reflects on it, the more they feel that they owe a lot to the black and don’t know how to repay them. So when someone put forward a plan to compensate blacks for $14 trillion, there were still a lot of respondents, but these white left did not know that this plan would destroy the black race. Because if the blacks were allowed to live high on the hog and even get pies from the sky, it is evident that this race would completely lose its vitality and eventually die.

Some blacks even overturned the statues of Washington and Jefferson. Just now, I saw a video of the blacks trying to overthrow the statue of Jackson. As the first civilian president of the United States, Jackson often lived in poverty, not to mention slavery. These behaviors of blacks are really speechless.

In fact, these black practices have completely lost the standard of fairness and justice in the Bible. Their hearts have been completely occupied by hatred and anger. Of course, they are more likely to be overwhelmed by the dissatisfaction of life and the pains in life. They are more and more extreme and go to spill their hair. When these extreme thoughts continue without a bottom line, everyone tries their best to express their repentance; they will have many absurd and weird thoughts. Therefore, it is easy to understand the white kissing shoe of the black on the street and even drinking the urine of the blacks. The ultimate reason is that it is impossible for humans to think about these ultimate moral problems. The ultimate morality should only be reflected in the ancient classics such as the Bible and the Tao Te Ching, and can only be based on these classics.

According to the teachings in the Bible, we come to the earth to accept punishment and bear suffering and pain. Only by believing in God can we regain salvation and return to heaven. If the whites actually feel that they owe the blacks, they should let them believe in God and make them gain real dignity and equality in the church and have real wisdom and talent. The most important thing to the blacks is to live independently and happily.

According to the logic above, I wonder if the tragic events in Chinese history are all the responsibility of the whites; the whites have to pay compensation. Are Asians looking for white compensation? In particular, Hong Kong is said to have been colonized for more than 100 years. Should British whites have to compensate the Chinese?

The day before yesterday, fox host Carlson, whom I highly praised, mentioned the word ” Bai Zuo” in the program and expressed it in Chinese pronunciation, indicating that the word “Bai Zuo” I often use has entered the mainstream society of the United States. At the same time, I am proud of my little contribution to the promotion of the word “Bai Zuo”. Carlson also explained the term “Bai Zuo”. He said that “Bai Zuo” means “elitism, ignoring social reality, caring for immigrants and ethnic minorities, and even allowing barbaric Islamic values to existing for cultural diversity, including LGBT (i.e. gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people). But “Bai Zuo” turned a blind eye to the real world’s problems. “Bai Zuo” pitied others and thought he was the world’s Savior and could help American society make a cultural revolution. “

Carlson’s discussion is very incisive, but I think he still doesn’t tell the essence of “Bai Zuo” The essence of “Bai Zuo” is to lose faith, which makes thinking lose standards and boundaries. Most “Bai Zuo”  are radical among Christians and even atheists. They allowed their thoughts to think freely, leading to the United States’ current chaos. This is the essence of “Bai Zuo”. Carlson and I are similar in age and thought. Suppose I have the opportunity to visit the United States. In that case, we will have an in-depth discussion and exchange with him to make the greatest contribution to the return of the United States to traditional Christian society and the revival of Christianity in the United States. Of course, these are digressions.